
I am breaking out of yet another long blogging sabbatical to talk about how absolutely excited I am about the up-coming World Cup. For those of you who are
familiar with my typical sarcastic (and really not very funny) sense of humor as well as my usual sports interests, no, I am not kidding about being very, very excited for the World Cup. There are three reasons for this.
1) It is the only major sporting event that has not been successfully prostituted by a major corporations and/or several major corporations (i.e. the Olympics and GE), yet. So far viewers are not forced into watching vanilla talking heads and commercials more than sporting events, as they are during the Olympics and much of the coverage of our four traditionally popular sports. Even if Disney (who owns ESPN and ABC, the stations that will be giving the world the World Cup this year) attempts to use their characteristically poor objectivity in regards to sports (see this years Rose Bowl predictions and how Reggie Bush is going to wash all your sins away) to completely objectify a great tournament, I don't think that die-hard European fans will allow soccer to become what college football has become in America, often valuing hype over substance.
2) It still means something. This is a really good point that my brother
Matt made who is also not a typical soccer fan. The Olympics used to mean that if someone won a gold medal then they were the best the world had to offer. Even worse, if you lost, you had no chance truly redeem yourself for four years, and after waiting for four years there was no guarantee you were still good enough to make it. This means that you had better come correct during the Olympics or else you may have no chance to redeem your dreams of being the world's best. I probably don't have to do a lot of convincing that the Olympics have really lost their luster, but I don't have a good reason why. The Olympic games just seem to be more like a gimmick every four years for NBC to promote themselves rather than showcasing the World's greatest athletes in sports that traditionally don't get much coverage but are fascinating none-the-less.
3) Michael Davies. I can point to the 2002 World Cup as the tournament that got me hooked much like I can point to the 1992 Barcelona Olympics that made me believe that sports can be powerful enough to define and even transcend the human experience (trust me, I am not trying to sound like Klaustermann). Part of that great experience four years ago was my devotion to
Michael Davies' daily journal of experiences in the 02 World Cup. I like Davies because he loves, truly loves, the sport that he covers (actually he only covers soccer, his daily job is a producer for ESPN and not a Page 2 writer). In regards to his coverage this year compared to four years ago He says, "
I pledge to write stylier this time, to get my facts straightier and to occasionally acknowledge the football and not just the beer, the nightlife and my inability to remember to put on deodorant. But my point of view will remain the same. It's for the fan who wishes he was there -- compared to the majority of the mainstream soccer writers who act like they wish they weren't." I love this statement. He follows the sport not out of some sort of
self loathing,
pessimistic, duty that he feels, but because he wants to be there and enjoys writing for, "the fan that wishes he was there." Isn't this why people like Keith Jackson, Jack Buck, Harry Carry, and Howard Cossell started reporting in the first place? Because we couldn't be there and we trusted them to tell what it was like, maybe even why it was important, fun, sad, or unexplainable. Michael Davies is fun to read and he makes me feel like I am experiencing a little bit of the greatness that truly is the World's most important tournament, even though I can't get to Germany. That's a good reporter and it's going to be a great cup.